4193 5235 9127 2529 5156 6961 4301 8064 6809 6732 3860 6118 9341 5453 3131 2447 3222 2203 4729 4255 9582 1488 5298 9027 5972 3656 1822 2108 1953 7025 2375 5527 6554 5633 9998 5462 9963 1450 4023 1651 1720 4861 1780 3685 7060 7452 2714 4617 8354 4551 5775 2194 4482 7808 9324 7322 4261 2631 9872 4143 4661 6564 8200 1507 4950 4460 4059 9375 2898 2680 6907 3581 2011 5496 9207 6495 1479 5699 7792 4497 7651 5841 9717 5822 3237 9135 6138 8585 8304 9631 2877 3725 7898 2010 7738 3618 2621 6439 2469 9075 9243 8142 8133 3419 3258 9268 8652 3357 8821 7147 8716 1643 7307 7012 1977 1682 6777 2750 7119 9389 7268 4038 4860 9391 3952 3940 1636 6868 6442 3000 5176 6251 1898 8996 3713 4335 5089 2388 1995 5873 9801 6277 9670 4399 2969 4853 7244 7980 3978 3878 7971 8455 2080 5553 9195 3235 4013 2237 2947 3300 9328 2130 4992 4820 6315 5594 5124 3960 2126 3068 4496 1016 6032 3818 3786 7586 6860 9001 7559 1921 1630 5243 1170 8839 4324 5575 6386 7957 8352 1791 1584 9205 6472 4603 6759 7978 4916 6457 5396 6408 7928 9570 2416 9455 4276 1240 8957 8372 1374 4081 9426 7878 6453 5466 2346 1021 5428 8644 1560 4564 5468 1258 3043 1684 1314 9593 4133 2362 3031 8342 7014 6612 5558 2972 2573 4329 2358 1481 8541 6264 1092 2667 7455 7702 1167 7017 7253 3394 5368 5994 8170 4502 4481 3373 5797 3170 2709 3500 6093 5050 1905 7681 3975 9783 6576 8403 1076 4092 3417 2992 8067 7647 4486 7285 8343 5766 2874 5481 6609 3895 9361 9724 7159 7709 2538 9380 3851 5461 9935 3163 1824 4024 4743 4485 8292 2725 9816 5456 6109 2450 8588 4958 9588 2428 2162 5267 3668 9297 1298 7215 5617 4430 8655 1505 2096 1417 3172 2490 1158 8322 8132 9610 8215 3963 9147 8811 8999 2656 6818 5602 1882 3677 5595 7670 7729 4328 3721 9980 4836 1805 8235 6410 1007 4933 8715 1229 1715 6671 1688 9032 6124 9769 2496 6760 7134 3881 4699 4987 5906 3584 3793 7641 9462 4435 7706 7130 9695 9161 1073 7250 8211 8181 7214 1473 6837 6923 8377 3994 8626 4682 1708 4398 1954 7933 2813 3011 6789 2836 9560 2741 8169 7146 3231 9490 8349 6798 2715 1266 8645 8526 2083 3479 3286 1732 4380 5591 1542 8658 6514 5584 9404 2354 7005 9271 9156 8149 9276 8099 3036 8780 2451 6394 5572 4566 8737 3322 7686 2596 3745 5077 4365 6493 3293 3948 9022 6428 7064 4047 6373 4689 1303 5689 1678 5066 8413 3333 1345 6826 3332 7391 4057 1779 6359 1292 7191 7891 2127 4972 9074 7409 8104 5911 2456 2809 5632 9379 3475 4756 2402 1900 6454 4806 6081 9000 8086 6380 6825 3831 4868 9339 7235 5375 5171 7882 2700 6301 3158 7208 9373 5429 4540 4727 9540 6567 7118 2562 6893 5249 7368 8758 3310 4121 5238 9138 8876 7072 7373 1131 6056 4060 8337 8481 7464 9456 9773 9190 1144 4832 6694 3979 7899 1717 6530 1188 4904 2164 3275 1918 5760 3189 1767 1348 6130 2313 2304 2365 3340 1510 1338 1500 7528 9507 2776 3134 6034 9703 2749 8409 5330 6045 3455 5505 6705 9616 3876 2331 5942 9171 6085 4866 4996 4909 1996 9200 4643 8689 5314 2727 7897 5549 2519 9966 3847 4167 5600 8965 1994 5256 2509 5228 7075 9856 4741 7768 7864 7321 7002 4130 3935 5646 6870 9149 1616 6204 1302 9099 7940 7532 8444 9424 8219 7688 7460 1629 9901 9746 9530 3790 5257 5655 4391 9641 9420 4449 5692 3005 6875 4834 5804 6076 6719 6015 6182 6823 4245 8602 7230 9894 5265 7941 5208 6030 3025 2890 2859 1054 1312 2254 4272 1405 3738 4348 9457 7197 7644 1102 4848 4346 6128 3551 2378 9330 6737 7582 3207 1893 4965 4137 4263 7340 5847 5798 8792 8379 1857 2574 5463 4709 9733 2411 4724 6962 4084 5380 1308 6726 4153 4707 5992 2171 4911 6293 7062 1080 2444 2040 1200 3253 9685 6856 6242 6447 1940 3517 6255 6573 3949 8445 8492 3583 8386 2572 4655 5237 8244 2270 3254 4487 8842 1854 3021 6680 6494 2493 9247 5382 3518 9013 8280 5744 9003 9106 6068 2389 2463 5674 5945 3434 4208 7482 1635 6474 7689 3710 6500 4841 7999 9347 3073 9253 4350 4720 8110 4134 5297 2917 4182 9122 9213 4150 1230 2053 3263 7463 7909 9984 1045 9325 3149 3575 3544 2200 8532 4697 5530 9632 9679 5400 3673 6341 8520 5840 3764 6246 5229 8593 3114 8210 5589 2220 9206 5002 9759 8581 8307 1729 4310 6284 6127 6489 1608 9173 4952 5191 2371 4008 9150 4217 6852 6649 4870 1051 6862 5790 5693 9454 2938 2434 4356 9237 1278 4451 9940 4939 9867 9672 2967 2043 6047 1564 1489 9441 8577 8317 1924 2166 4168 7687 4732 9112 2577 7664 6211 8017 1347 3161 2412 7684 4565 6011 3121 2737 2483 9179 6533 7237 3990 9815 8340 7549 3802 5915 8319 4823 5467 6069 9453 5104 6243 5347 2518 3265 8216 3484 2706 3066 2543 8016 4262 5615 8791 6363 4922 3534 1827 8253 1765 3427 6355 3868 7948 9284 1513 8460 1614 1771 9313 7719 1057 5613 2650 4772 4693 9496 2533 7173 2505 7970 2492 3858 8030 9639 3458 8298 3472 9562 1009 1673 5626 5965 8261 3540 9662 7649 7450 2024 2461 8616 9105 5870 1797 9601 7105 3386 8013 7849 9357 6728 6484 7125 1528 7193 7770 1062 9320 7217 8744 4585 3048 1601 7232 4976 6914 9877 4970 2188 3269 8043 9175 6360 4072 5032 3199 8694 9883 4624 4769 4478 3295 3947 7910 3730 9008 7606 9667 8940 1870 2985 5676 8651 3016 4660 1301 5392 2720 7748 2245 9064 6582 3859 7009 4131 3369 5303 3760 5027 3496 7848 1296 4256 5750 4154 3805 2311 8098 2174 6670 8109 5984 6548 4628 4283 7195 2277 4974 7895 4462 9993 3863 2676 7260 6519 7945 5576 9484 1333 3569 3303 7476 5785 9962 9917 4298 2544 4531 4538 3049 7275 8600 4872 4941 6389 7334 5465 7454 6757 4364 1140 2585 5076 3416 6350 5236 2401 1430 4039 4420 9708 7057 7471 4561 9076 6682 5735 2395 6922 5477 8739 4831 6052 2834 9713 2762 6748 1826 3206 6059 9971 6317 6646 6049 4900 5953 8189 7950 4988 5057 6083 5085 1217 3571 4234 7211 1631 5784 1803 6845 2110 7661 8883 7426 8071 5401 7049 1444 8505 7288 2632 2022 5111 3330 2282 7098 3849 8647 9398 7497 6978 4563 8141 6340 4527 5596 2232 9688 7914 5701 2932 1786 2425 6042 4102 4706 2734 6288 5733 1845 9677 1821 2738 4704 3598 7148 5761 2419 1668 8613 5366 8138 7343 2939 6390 4353 9308 1671 7473 9763 8266 9907 8461 4937 4962 2204 8914 6780 2364 3843 2800 9299 6219 4512 5759 2309 4342 9509 3407 7818 5444 6019 2728 5319 5905 8628 3453 2982 9652 9975 7472 1764 1950 1079 4089 4323 9964 7662 2068 9371 3826 4898 1745 4397 6002 4980 2623 7822 1339 5264 6611 4299 4249 9240 1948 8548 5037 8395 2488 4367 5029 7365 8738 9533 2767 8080 2345 3360 1747 9169 6302 2385 9053 9133 5443 1264 5490 5036 8525 8094 5014 4666 4725 1020 3280 4213 5913 2256 8032 3030 9355 8432 3739 2536 9042 8878 3987 3932 1146 2986 3382 9946 3769 4517 7481 9536 8485 9049 3729 8538 3900 8039 8516 1844 8389 9982 7657 5003 9696 3580 6695 2589 4326 1662 3067 5385 9727 8939 2140 2512 8044 4316 9666 2735 2234 8872 5751 8254 7358 8217 9429 1372 4404 6984 2545 1672 6601 4899 9864 6692 5876 4161 3885 2089 4141 1328 6209 5532 8427 9393 5976 7827 6382 6903 4388 7174 2196 1998 8006 2197 5323 2563 1633 7600 2208 7162 4445 3439 7241 1749 6379 6100 9222 2026 4177 8882 2326 6700 2320 6187 5734 7117 5501 9922 9144 6146 4369 5629 9411 6878 1769 1912 6648 3667 9252 2693 6928 1532 2268 5359 1663 1539 5125 3626 1178 1395 2405 6441 4855 1869 9479 7001 3608 6432 2052 6203 2306 1676 5408 5195 2290 6749 7266 3284 5641 9534 3348 3430 8771 9103 4268 4847 8706 8089 1788 5631 2198 3080 5370 7638 9543 2085 5083 4069 3152 4373 7926 2154 1066 7234 8891 9352 8853 6290 2030 6469 1652 4051 5101 3494 7731 7192 6793 7601 6196 5309 6677 4077 6236 2281 4061 1218 9217 7179 3200 9107 3006 8431 3799 4745 2642 3755 5653 3537 9512 2013 2366 9079 2448 5167 4717 5223 2120 9840 4816 5252 1120 1297 1078 5154 2989 1413 3428 7137 5610 3058 3208 9224 5858 1549 5091 7577 7210 3052 5218 9531 2797 2629 2951 8371 1394 4575 7800 9141 5325 5308 7356 4185 7735 1224 9043 7046 3964 3470 6105 5853 7013 4795 1618 9745 4309 5814 4300 3595 1721 2643 8259 9069 9569 2964 7031 1957 2852 5459 4371 7161 3622 8851 7500 3392 7672 4165 8448 2765 1432 8083 4105 7597 1222 6877 1741 2397 6405 6254 2318 2868 8595 8788 3602 3587 3289 5151 9073 5336 7799 2131 7576 6321 1665 4664 9620 4874 1046 7886 9549 3808 3028 1351 2048 4034 7743 8442 6578 5486 7160 9976 7648 7874 6364 5795 1034 7480 3842 1283 4201 3123 3480 7163 6459 1525 7889 4058 6588 9615 3731 1409 8345 2440 2919 4639 6491 5351 7489 3680 4528 1967 9368 5904 2683 1115 1485 4650 1490 3205 6754 5923 8733 1050 2889 8031 3370 1619 5909 8667 1808 4739 9691 7521 7555 8711 9781 8861 5722 7993 3175 1943 8009 4935 5045 5697 6174 5644 3734 9342 3294 2587 9817 4254 7079 4066 7059 7445 9185 5172 4582 8227 1089 2804 3774 9945 5579 8830 1252 6044 1978 1423 2957 6758 6125 8749 7667 2578 8202 8366 3536 7262 4043 3385 4473 9277 9889 4000 6824 1435 6982 5619 4763 4402 7461 4621 9343 9023 4075 6461 6634 8813 9870 8900 5321 9849 1147 4525 2637
Daybreak Man
Home Daybreak Man
Daybreak Man
Two Creeks in Herriman, Utah: A Disaster in Density

By DaybreakMan, on 09-08-2008 22:19

Views : 5270    

Favoured : None

Published in : User Columns, Daybreak Man

     In an earlier post I mentioned housing density and how it impacts the surrounding community. The main point of the article was to show that density in and of itself is not a bad thing. However, if a dense development is not properly planned and located, it will almost certainly have a detrimental effect on the community.

     When writing that article, I was not aware of the aspirations of a developer to build a high-density rental development in Herriman. Considering the proximity to Daybreak, this development will almost certainly affect those residents of Founders Park Village. Daybreak as a whole will be affected by this new development as the new high school for the area will be located adjacent to the development.

     The new development will be called Two Creeks. Miller Timbergate Associates LLC appeared before the Herriman City government to gain approval for the first two phases of the project: Timbergate and Farmgate. These two phases will be dense. At around 20 units per acre, this will truly be the densest development around. Even Daybreak following the concept of new urbanism cannot claim densities as high as this development. Even if densities get higher in Daybreak in the future, they will be integrated into the community with a transect style of planning. Two Creeks is located near homes that are not even close to the planned density of nearby developments. Imagine your home next to multiple 4 story, 32 unit complexes. The Two Creeks plan suggests that the developer wants to develop his land his way without regard to the surrounding community in a piecemeal fashion that really doesn't fit.

     The estimated population of the two approved projects is 1,696 people. With this many people, traffic is a real concern. However, this development will be located next to the proposed path of the Mountain View Corridor. By doing this, much of the traffic from the development will likely be dissipated. Not a bad idea right? Most local governments are in cooperation through Envision Utah to put higher densities next to the transit corridors. One problem with this plan is that it assumes that the Mountain View Corridor will be built and that when it is built that it will not be a toll road. If it is a toll road, I cannot imagine many of the residents of Two Creeks utilizing the road. TRAX is nearby, but these residents will be made to cross not only 118th South, but also the Mountain View Corridor to access it. Unless significant infrastructure is put in place to make this crossing safe, you will see additional problems. It will just be easier for them to hop in a car and drive. The location of this development, on the fringe of Salt Lake County, should also be a consideration as the price of gas would prevent the necessary long commute for many of these residents. Most of which are calculated to not have substantial financial means.

     The traffic problem will only be exacerbated by the fact that the new area high school will be located literally within feet of the development. I wonder if all of the sports facilities that come along with the high school will be perceived as amenities for Two Creeks. Also, with the concentration of a lower socio-economic population you will have dual working parents and transient families. With many of the parents gone, I can imagine quite a few students hanging out in Two Creeks without supervision after school.

     The single worst part of this development is that it will concentrate thousands of citizens of a lower socio-economic class. As stated in an earlier post about density this can cause a multitude of problems. Crime and social disruption will increase in this area with such a large concentration. This cluster will enable all of the myths that are associated with a higher-density development to have an opportunity to come true.

     I have it from a good source that these units are meant for government Section 8 housing. The Section 8 program allows those who qualify to pay rents that are adjusted to their income. 30% of their income goes to rent. For example, if a low-income family made 1500 dollars per month they would spend about 450 dollars for rent each month. The government covers the rest. This program can truly help those in need, but the idea is to spread those who are on the program over a wide geographic area not concentrate them. We already have Section 8 families in our community, but they are dispersed.

     So why is this happening and why now? With the housing market being in doubt there are many people waiting out the market in hopes to buy when the market starts to go up again. Other people cannot afford a mortgage as the new lending criteria prevents them from qualifying. So what do these people do? They rent. With Utah’s strong economy, there are more people moving to the valley in search of jobs and many will opt to rent for a variety of reasons. All of this combined has pushed monthly rents up 10% in the last year alone. The rental market is starting to look really attractive to a lot of investors. I would not be surprised to see a lot of developments pop up in various communities that are high density and haven’t been integrated properly. That is why people need to be more involved at the local government level about what happens in their community. I believe the Sunstone residents (just to the west of Daybreak) would agree with me as they seem to have attended the relevant meetings and have even appealed the approval of Two Creeks. Hopefully this mess will be stopped before it is too late.

     Attached is a map of the entire area of the new High School (opening fall 2010)  going in on 118th and the MVC and its surroundings...

     I want to say thank you to Daybreak Man for working with me on this story, I helped with research, he wrote the story (he's a better writer) and pleae remember to visit Daybreak Man's blog for other great stories at : http://daybreaktoday.blogspot.com/

Scoop-

Last update: 10-09-2008 22:31

User comments (2)
Print E-mail
User Rating: / 26
PoorBest 
Attachments:
 118th future developement[118th future developement]374 Kb
 
Housing Density and NIMBYs

By Scoop, on 06-07-2008 09:35

Views : 2444    

Favoured : None

Published in : User Columns, Daybreak Man

 

Housing density has been and will remain the most common disagreement with regards to new development in existing towns. The politics surrounding this issue can be fierce with strong emotions on all sides. The battle over density usually starts when a developer purchases land with plans to build medium to high-density residential. One resident will hear about the pending project and will rally the troops. This person is usually referred to as a NIMBY which stands for Not In My Back Yard. This neighborhood watchdog will then broadcast the message that an evil developer is trying to profit with a new development and does not care about its impact on the surrounding community.

This was the case with Daybreak and many other new urban communities across the nation. The question that I would like to ask most NIMBYs is this:
how did you inform yourself about the topic of density and its effects? Some of them call on first-hand experience. The neighbors near many developments complain about the traffic that the development is causing. Of course while the infrastructure that will accompany the development is only starting these neighbors pass judgment by what they see immediately. This short-term, subjectivity should not be taken as fact, but many NIMBY’s present it as fact. Many NIMBYs that I have talked to use the words “its just common sense” all too often when trying to explain their information source. While I feel that common sense is a valid tool that cannot be underestimated, I also feel that it is sometimes confused with myth.
 

 

 

These myths are traditional in my opinion. Passed down through the generations and are added to with each new generation. The history of where these myths started reaches back as far as the 1800s. The US started as an agricultural nation and transitioned into an industrial nation with factories and mass production. This transition was accompanied by waves of immigration from Europe. Each new wave contained different ethnic groups that were overtly discriminated against. This discrimination clustered these immigrants into densely populated areas with the least desirable jobs. This segregation along socio-economic status lines resulted in the materialization of many of the myths that are associated with density.

Fast forward to the age of suburbia that started after World War II. Being enabled to travel long distances via automobile, people could more economically live in the suburbs and further segregate themselves. Zoning use ordinances specified separation of land use and from then on commercial could no longer coexist with residential. In many cases this meant separation of density as well. Fast forward again to the 70s and 80s where the government decided to build “project housing” which not only segregated people of lower socio-economic status, but actually concentrated them. Many of these were an immediate failure with rampant crime and social problems. The images created by these projects reverberated with further intensity in the media particularly in movies and television. The “inner city” was a dangerous crime ridden area only suitable for those “other” people. All of these events perpetuated the myths of density with a simple philosophy: guilty by association.

So what is the real story behind density? The best way to answer this question is to address the myths often cited by NIMBYs one at a time.

Myth: Density will lower the value of my home. Many things can lower the value of a home, but density is not by itself one of them. In fact researchers have conducted many studies on single-family housing that is located in proximity to dense residential developments. The conclusion of these studies is that there is not a significant difference in the appreciation rate of those single family homes located in close proximity to high residential developments and those single-family homes located further away. In fact the percentage of appreciation is 2.9 versus 2.7 percent. This is not a significant difference. However, if you have an apartment building located next to your home that is 5 stories tall, over 30 years old, the grass is browning, windows are broken, loud music is blaring from the windows, and the paint is literally peeling like a sunburn, then this will obviously lower the value of your home. Of course, if a single family residence was in the same state, then it would lower the value of your home as well.


Another myth is that dense housing will create more traffic. Obviously if you add more cars to an area you will have more traffic. However, research has proven that higher density housing decreases traffic per person. Single family detached homes average 10 car trips a day. Compare that to the 6.3 car trips per day made by people living in townhomes and condominiums. Density is also needed for public transportation to be feasible. The Mid-Jordan TRAX line would not extend to South Jordan at all if not for the density that will make up the Daybreak Town Center. This mode of transportation will bring an additional choice for transportation that is likely to be used considering gas prices. Daybreak further mitigates traffic by having most necessities within walking distance which encourages the two-legged commute.The most prominent myth about density is that it creates crime. This claim is absolutely false. Numerous studies have been conducted and the conclusion is that per population, crime is the same in higher density housing as it is in single family housing. The perception of crime is perpetuated when the observer holds an entire apartment complex to the same standard as one single family home. So when three juveniles from the same complex commit a crime and the police show up at the apartment complex three times in one year, it is considered “crime ridden.” On the other hand if the police show up for a juvenile in a single family residence this is considered an “anomaly.” Crime research indicates that crimes increase in accordance with certain socioeconomic indicators such as education attainment, unemployment (particularly of males), and the poverty rate.

The final main myth is that dense residential housing is unattractive and is only desired by lower-income households. Considering the changing demographics and preferences of consumers, this assumption is not based in reality. This market appeals to empty-nester and first-time home buyers tremendously.
As with anything in real estate it is all about location, location, location. You can buy a single-family home in some locations for half of the price of a town home in south Jordan. Considering that the average income earner in Utah currently cannot purchase high-density housing in many areas, I would have to say that it is not just the poor that are moving into condos and townhomes. If the housing has a good design and is well maintained it will attract quality residents who care about and participate in their community.

So who is winning this battle, the NIMBYs or the New Urbanists? The New Urbanists have the clear lead, but this depends greatly on where you live. In North Dakota and Oklahoma , the NIMBYs are holding their ground. If you live in Utah , Colorado , Texas , Florida , or California on the other hand, the New Urbanists are definitely ahead of the game. Since its inception in the early 80s, New Urbanism has grown at a phenomenal rate in most states. Locally, more and more new urban developments are popping up. They are called by different names such as smart growth or transit oriented developments, but they are the same with respect to density.

In fact, South Jordan will shortly be surrounded by these developments. With the Herriman Towne Center , Daybreak, Jordan River , and other future communities coming to light, New Urbanism will also be the future of development locally. A number of strong forces demand this density. Energy costs demand homes that are more efficient, smaller, easier to take care of, and closer to the necessities of life. Businesses now want to locate their operations in communities that are vibrant, walkable, and have transit nearby. Density is the vehicle that has to be used to accomplish these attributes. The government wants density as it allows for less expenditure on infrastructure per tax payer. Finally, people are demanding more density and they are voting with their feet. The success of dense New Urban communities speaks volumes about this demand.

Density will have its place in the future of South Jordan, but if not planned correctly it can cause problems. Density cannot be thrown in a community in a half hazard manner in order for the developer to make a buck. Instead it should be planned and integrated correctly according to transect planning and community needs. These new developments must feature good designs that are sensitive to the context of the surrounding community. These designs and features must be maintained by a community organization such as a HOA. I can see why many NIMBYs are opposed to housing density, but assumptions should not be made based on false associations of the past. To those NIMBYs who will fight till their last breath any development that has more density that 2 units per acre consider if your beliefs about density are actually true. Also consider if your energy might be better spent ensuring that these developments are integrated properly instead of trying to ban them all together. Density is here to stay. Instead of a battle of how many units per acre, we need to ensure that these units are built, maintained, and located in a fashion that will enhance the community for all of us.


This article submitted by SCOOP on behalf of Daybreak Man, If you would like to see more his articles just go to http://daybreaktoday.blogspot.com  

Last update: 11-09-2008 07:02

Be first to comment this article
Print E-mail
 
Traffic In Daybreak

By Scoop, on 06-07-2008 09:21

Views : 2573    

Favoured : None

Published in : User Columns, Daybreak Man

With the increase in the planned density at Daybreak concerns have surfaced about the increase in traffic. The current plans for Daybreak call for over 20,000 homes to be located within the community. All of these residents will have cars. Most of them will have more than one along with more than one member of the family to drive them. If you do the math on these numbers you can easily see the thousands of car trips that will be necessary for each family daily. However, these calculations are based off of the traditional suburban model of traffic. Daybreak follows the principles of New Urbanism and studies have shown that there is a significant difference in the amount of traffic generated by these diametrically opposed planning schemes.

New Urbanism improves transportation choice and reduces traffic speeds. These New Urban design features tend to reduce per capita automobile ownership and use. While most individual features have modest impacts on total travel, their effects are synergistic resulting in significant total reductions in vehicle use. Research has proved that residents that live in well-designed New Urbanist neighborhoods with good walkability, mixed land use, connected streets, and local services tend to drive 20-35% less than residents in automobile dependent areas. Another study has concluded that these residents take 305.5% more walking trips than residents of conventionally designed suburbs. While these benefits have not materialized immediately in Daybreak, most of the research suggests that these benefits will not be realized until developments are "made whole" with the majority of basic needs within a short distance of homes.

 

 In addition to the traffic reducing affects of mixed-use communities, Daybreak offers a variety of traffic calming structural features in its design. The most noticable of these are the two roundabouts that deflect traffic from two fairly high-speed parkways that lead to Daybreak from Bangerter Highway. These arterial roundabouts distribute traffic in a more efficient manner than 4-way intersections and slow traffic down upon their entrance to Daybreak. Recent studies have also proven that roundabouts significantly reduce vehicle crashes compared to intersections.

Another traffic calming feature is the neckdowns that are placed at most intersections in Daybreak. Neckdowns are curb extensions at intersections that reduce the roadway width and tighten the curb radii at the corner. Again this feature slows traffic, but it also decreases the distance that a pedestrian must travel to cross the street and makes the pedestrian more visible. There are other traffic calming measures, but these two are the most effective.

 

 

 Even with all of these measures, there are still drivers that choose to speed down the street, racing to their destination. This practice has irked quite a few residents in the community including the Daybreak Daily website author Scoop. He decided to do somethign about it and worked with the City of South Jordan to monitor the traffic on a particularly problematic street in Daybreak where drivers tend to speed. The street in question is Kestrel Rise. One of the main problems with this street is that when driving South you drive down hill. This obviously increases speed and many do not slow down until they are only feet away from a stop sign. While these studies gave an average speed of 25 mph, this is simply an average. The traffic monitoring devices registered speeds of up to 50 mph on this street. Of course speeds like this did not happen every day, but speeds of 35 to 40 mph are fairly common depending on the day of the week.

What additional options are there to preven cars from accelerating to 50 mph in an area where kids play? A few design features come to mind. Traffic slowing features such as humps or speed bumps as some people call them. These features actually come in a large variety and are one of the most effective design features in slowing traffic speed. There is a downside to this though. Cost. You would think that making a bump in the road would not be very expensive, but in this case a properly designed bump can cost thousands of dollars. The question that keeps popping up in my mind is this: Isn't a few thousand dollars worth it when a simple design feature can (and probably will someday) save the life of a child? Especially considering this street is adjacent to an elementary school.

I would deem most streets in Daybreak to be safe. This safety is due to the design features that were likely planned from the very beginning. However, no plan is perfect and some adjustments need to be made here and there. While speed humps may not be the answer, planners and the community need to do something about people driving 35 to 50 miles per hour past homes full of children and an elementary school.

 

This article submitted by SCOOP on behalf of Daybreak Man, If you would like to see more his articles just go to http://daybreaktoday.blogspot.com 

Last update: 11-09-2008 07:03

User comments (3)
Print E-mail
User Rating: / 16
PoorBest 
 
Daybreak Village 3: North Shore

By Scoop, on 18-06-2008 10:39

Views : 2890    

Favoured : None

Published in : User Columns, Daybreak Man

    The Daybreak community is about to grow yet again. North Shore is the newest edition to the Daybreak master plan making three villages total. With two new builders, Ivory Homes and Garbett Homes, a large push is being made to finish the 22 homes that will serve as models for the "grand opening" slated for June 28th. I usually do not need to drive on the South Jordan Parkway so when I did take that route a few weeks ago I was surprised with the sheer amount of building going on. Buildings seemed to have popped out of nowhere in only a couple of weeks. Of course, with the slowdown in the housing market I'm sure that contractors were not hard to find.     

     The new homes of North Shore seem to be an eclectic mix of traditional and urban contemporary designs. I was fairly shocked when I saw pictures of the new row homes that Garbett Homes intends to build. These modern boxy buildings seem to belong more in the marmalade district of Salt Lake City than in Daybreak. While I respect the modern style, I do not have a strong taste for it to say the least. However, these town homes will be integrated into the denser sections of North Shore. It seems Kennecott Land has decided that as density increases traditional style will decrease. I do see some advantages in the cost of building such homes. Perhaps this advantage is the reason why some homes will be offered at a price that will be difficult for other communities to match. Many of these condos or town homes will be offered from the "low 100s" to "mid 100s."    

     With these prices the old adage of "you get what you pay for" keeps ringing in my mind. This ringing stops abruptly however when I see the actual square footage of these units. With sizes ranging from 650 square feet to 1180 square feet I think Kennecott Land has decided to make housing more affordable by making it smaller. This is the right way to go in my opinion. Skimp on the space, but do not skimp on the quality. The prices in North Shore are fairly reasonable compared to Eastlake and even Founders Village. The effects of this new village are many and will need to be discussed in a later post. 

     In the grand scheme that is Daybreak, North Shore will bring a large amount of units at a density that has not yet been seen in this new urbanist community. In fact, Kennecott recently changed their projections for the total number of homes to be located within Daybreak. The number initially started at 13,600. This number has since increased to 20,000, almost a 50 percent increase. The recent planning maps for Daybreak show an increase in density in those properties East of Oquirrh Lake. Why did this change come about? I can only speculate, but I will be researching this issue in the future. One thing is for certain, North Shore has signaled a change in direction for future development at Daybreak.

 

 

This article submitted by SCOOP on behalf of Daybreak Man, If you would like to see more his articles just go to http://daybreaktoday.blogspot.com 

Last update: 11-09-2008 08:24

User comments (2)
Print E-mail
User Rating: / 3
PoorBest 
 


Copyright © 2020 daybreakdaily.com. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.